Andrew,
Here in Australia, within my remit we look after a large financial institution managing a geographically dispersed portfolio of 500,000+sqm across 450+ branches and office locations, our approach is largely risk based while balancing security, operational efficiency, customer experience, and contractor needs. For contractors and vendors who require frequent or daily access to our sites, such as cleaning providers, we generally provide managed access arrangements and trust based protocols (inc police checks, probity clearance etc) appropriate to the nature of the service being delivered. Obviously arrnageing guards or constant supervision for these routine services would be operationally impractical across a portfolio of our scale.
For maintenance contractors and project vendors, access requirements are assessed based on the nature, location, timing, and risk profile of the works. Where works can reasonably be completed during business hours under the presence of branch colleagues, we typically utilise this approach. Where works are disruptive to customers or our colleagues, or require access to sensitive areas, involve multiple entry points, or are undertaken outside business hours, additional security controls may be introduced, including guarding services.
Regarding "all clear" processes for all property related incidents, responsibility typically sits with the Property function in partnership with branch operations, with requirements varying depending on the nature of the threat, event, or business continuity scenario.
For power outages, our response is similarly risk based. Decisions are influenced by the severity and expected duration of the outage, impacts to customer service, safety considerations, physical security systems, and the availability of business continuity measures. We are leveraging AI to help with feasibility on locations where investment is warranted for branches to put on UPS, i.e. repeated power outages, El Nino impacted regions etc. Some of our locations we have installed plug-in generator points as result of long drawn outages. The decision to remain open or temporarily close is generally based on maintaining safe and secure operations for both customers and colleagues, our Property will provide an 'all clear' in consultation with the business who occupy these premises. .
Overall, our experience is that there is rarely a one size fits all model. Portfolio scale, branch design, security availability, and operational requirements all play a role in determining the most appropriate access and security controls.
------------------------------
Kyle Swinden
Head of, Property Services
National Australia Bank
VIC, Australia
+61414661611
------------------------------